<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackwater Seeps Into Illinois</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.citybarbs.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=70" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70</link>
	<description>Growing Pains in DeKalb, Illinois, USA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:42:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badges? We Don&#8217;t Have No Stinking Badges &#124; Sleepycatz</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-14653</link>
		<dc:creator>Badges? We Don&#8217;t Have No Stinking Badges &#124; Sleepycatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-14653</guid>
		<description>[...] The Iraqi government said today that it would revoke the license of the private security firm BlackwaterUSA, due to the reckless actions of its employees. Blackwater is is been know for supplying the contractors who were killed in Fallujah &#8212; an event which sparked a major siege of the city costing thousands of lives. Lesser known, of course, is their construction of private military basis in California and Illinois for training and their deployment to New Orleans shortly after Katrina. The problem with the Iraqi government announcement is that Blackwater does not currently have a license to operate in Iraq to revoke. According PSCAI, Blackwater started the certification process, but hasn&#8217;t completed it. Blackwater operates in Iraq under contracts provided by the State Department and CIA, and it can be guaranteed that niether one of those organization is going to take its queues from the government of Iraq. So what&#8217;s all the hubbub about then? The news does suggest that the Iraqi government may be getting tired of the wild west antics of private security contractors, or it may suggest that the Iraqi government is trying to show they are not the obedient  puppies of American corporate powers. Nonetheless, very little, if anything will change with the Iraqi government&#8217;s announcement. If nothing else is it simply a diversion to suggest a more just reality where none really exists; for &#8212; you would imagine &#8212; in a just world a government would be able to expel a private foreign army from its soil. But not in Iraq. blackwater, corruption, Iraq [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Iraqi government said today that it would revoke the license of the private security firm BlackwaterUSA, due to the reckless actions of its employees. Blackwater is is been know for supplying the contractors who were killed in Fallujah &#8212; an event which sparked a major siege of the city costing thousands of lives. Lesser known, of course, is their construction of private military basis in California and Illinois for training and their deployment to New Orleans shortly after Katrina. The problem with the Iraqi government announcement is that Blackwater does not currently have a license to operate in Iraq to revoke. According PSCAI, Blackwater started the certification process, but hasn&#8217;t completed it. Blackwater operates in Iraq under contracts provided by the State Department and CIA, and it can be guaranteed that niether one of those organization is going to take its queues from the government of Iraq. So what&#8217;s all the hubbub about then? The news does suggest that the Iraqi government may be getting tired of the wild west antics of private security contractors, or it may suggest that the Iraqi government is trying to show they are not the obedient  puppies of American corporate powers. Nonetheless, very little, if anything will change with the Iraqi government&#8217;s announcement. If nothing else is it simply a diversion to suggest a more just reality where none really exists; for &#8212; you would imagine &#8212; in a just world a government would be able to expel a private foreign army from its soil. But not in Iraq. blackwater, corruption, Iraq [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treesfieldssky</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>treesfieldssky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>Just as an update. AS soon as the zoning issue was passed Blackwater has now added a sub-machine gun course to their class schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as an update. AS soon as the zoning issue was passed Blackwater has now added a sub-machine gun course to their class schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yinn</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-3345</link>
		<dc:creator>yinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-3345</guid>
		<description>tategoi, I know very little about guns. I did, however, read the bill summary:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Provides that 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act, it is unlawful for any person within this State to knowingly manufacture, deliver, sell, purchase, or possess or cause to be manufactured, delivered, sold, purchased, or possessed a semi-automatic assault weapon, an assault weapon attachment, any .50 caliber rifle, or .50 caliber cartridge. Provides that beginning 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act, it is unlawful for any person within this State to knowingly manufacture, deliver, sell, purchase, or possess or cause to be manufactured, delivered, sold, purchased, or possessed a large capacity ammunition feeding device. Provides that these provisions do not apply to a person who possessed a prohibited weapon, device, or attachment before the effective date of this amendatory Act if the person has provided proof of ownership to the Department of State Police within 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act. Provides that on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act, such person may transfer such device only to an heir, an individual residing in another state maintaining that device in another state, or a dealer licensed as a federal firearms dealer.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you tell me that a shotgun is a semi-automatic weapon, I&#039;d be skeptical but have no real knowledge to counter what you&#039;re saying. Or maybe I&#039;m reading that part wrong. But I do know a grandfather clause when I see one.

When it comes to your comment

&lt;blockquote&gt;Instead of focusing on “bad” guns, shouldn’t we focus on bad politicians who have the power to send our loved ones into harm’s way? 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m totally with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tategoi, I know very little about guns. I did, however, read the bill summary:</p>
<blockquote><p>Provides that 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act, it is unlawful for any person within this State to knowingly manufacture, deliver, sell, purchase, or possess or cause to be manufactured, delivered, sold, purchased, or possessed a semi-automatic assault weapon, an assault weapon attachment, any .50 caliber rifle, or .50 caliber cartridge. Provides that beginning 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act, it is unlawful for any person within this State to knowingly manufacture, deliver, sell, purchase, or possess or cause to be manufactured, delivered, sold, purchased, or possessed a large capacity ammunition feeding device. Provides that these provisions do not apply to a person who possessed a prohibited weapon, device, or attachment before the effective date of this amendatory Act if the person has provided proof of ownership to the Department of State Police within 90 days after the effective date of this amendatory Act. Provides that on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act, such person may transfer such device only to an heir, an individual residing in another state maintaining that device in another state, or a dealer licensed as a federal firearms dealer.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you tell me that a shotgun is a semi-automatic weapon, I&#8217;d be skeptical but have no real knowledge to counter what you&#8217;re saying. Or maybe I&#8217;m reading that part wrong. But I do know a grandfather clause when I see one.</p>
<p>When it comes to your comment</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead of focusing on “bad” guns, shouldn’t we focus on bad politicians who have the power to send our loved ones into harm’s way?
</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m totally with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yinn</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>yinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>Hey, Trees, &lt;a href=&quot;http://noprivatearmies.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s your article&lt;/a&gt; reprinted in full at another person&#039;s blog. Does he have your permission to do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Trees, <a href="http://noprivatearmies.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s your article</a> reprinted in full at another person&#8217;s blog. Does he have your permission to do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tategoi</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-2625</link>
		<dc:creator>tategoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-2625</guid>
		<description>DEar Yinn,

Me again.  You missed most of myt original point, namely that a blue anti-gun state, led by Democratic anti-gunners turned a very blind eye to a group led by a right wing evangelical extremist who has bilked the American taxpayer out of millions and millions of $  Instead of focusing on &quot;bad&quot; guns, shouldn&#039;t we focus on bad politicians who have the power to send our loved ones into harm&#039;s way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DEar Yinn,</p>
<p>Me again.  You missed most of myt original point, namely that a blue anti-gun state, led by Democratic anti-gunners turned a very blind eye to a group led by a right wing evangelical extremist who has bilked the American taxpayer out of millions and millions of $  Instead of focusing on &#8220;bad&#8221; guns, shouldn&#8217;t we focus on bad politicians who have the power to send our loved ones into harm&#8217;s way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tategoi</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>tategoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>Hello Yinn,

Sorry, but you&#039;re incorrect here.  The .22 rifle that I bought for my grandkids to learn on will be rendered illegal.  Hunting and sporting shotguns will be rendered illegal:  a 12 guage is larger than .50 caliber and virtually all semi-auto shotguns can hold too many 1.5&quot; shells (virtually impossible to get, but irrelevant) to be &quot;legal.  My WWII M-1 rifle, purchased legally from the Citizenship Marksmanship Program (government sponsored), will be illegal.  Many folks, myself included, have AR-15 platform rifles set up with long, heavy target barrels for target shooting purposes.  They&#039;ll be illegal.  Many target rifles use what are called thumbhole stocks for the best possible grip/aim - they&#039;ll be illegal.

Springfield Armory, Rock River Arms and other firearms manufacturers located in Illinois (they also make weapons for our soldiers in Iraq) will leave Illinois if the bill passes.  This is in print.  More jobs lost to Illinois and four less companies for Blago to tax for his 6 billion $ heallth care/pensio bail out.  

What really irks me is that those of us who purchase and use firearms legally and safely and who cause no harm to you or anyone else, are going to be criminalized.  And more heavily taxed.  What do you think it will cost the state to have all of us who currently own soon to be banned firearms go and register them?  Where will the manpower come from?  Blago has already cut back on the personnel who process FOID cards and DNR staff, so where are the hundreds of staffers going to come from?

Finally, there is only ONE semi-automatic .50 semi-automatic &quot;assault&quot; weapon:  the Barrett .50 that weighs about 15 - 20 pounds and costs over $9000.  There are currently no ranges in Illinois (except Blackwater&#039;s!) that will allow you to shoot one - that is if you can afford one.  I&#039;d be willing to wager that there are fewer than 10 in the entire state and that&#039;s a real stretch.  Lots of money for something you can&#039;t shoot anywhere anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Yinn,</p>
<p>Sorry, but you&#8217;re incorrect here.  The .22 rifle that I bought for my grandkids to learn on will be rendered illegal.  Hunting and sporting shotguns will be rendered illegal:  a 12 guage is larger than .50 caliber and virtually all semi-auto shotguns can hold too many 1.5&#8243; shells (virtually impossible to get, but irrelevant) to be &#8220;legal.  My WWII M-1 rifle, purchased legally from the Citizenship Marksmanship Program (government sponsored), will be illegal.  Many folks, myself included, have AR-15 platform rifles set up with long, heavy target barrels for target shooting purposes.  They&#8217;ll be illegal.  Many target rifles use what are called thumbhole stocks for the best possible grip/aim &#8211; they&#8217;ll be illegal.</p>
<p>Springfield Armory, Rock River Arms and other firearms manufacturers located in Illinois (they also make weapons for our soldiers in Iraq) will leave Illinois if the bill passes.  This is in print.  More jobs lost to Illinois and four less companies for Blago to tax for his 6 billion $ heallth care/pensio bail out.  </p>
<p>What really irks me is that those of us who purchase and use firearms legally and safely and who cause no harm to you or anyone else, are going to be criminalized.  And more heavily taxed.  What do you think it will cost the state to have all of us who currently own soon to be banned firearms go and register them?  Where will the manpower come from?  Blago has already cut back on the personnel who process FOID cards and DNR staff, so where are the hundreds of staffers going to come from?</p>
<p>Finally, there is only ONE semi-automatic .50 semi-automatic &#8220;assault&#8221; weapon:  the Barrett .50 that weighs about 15 &#8211; 20 pounds and costs over $9000.  There are currently no ranges in Illinois (except Blackwater&#8217;s!) that will allow you to shoot one &#8211; that is if you can afford one.  I&#8217;d be willing to wager that there are fewer than 10 in the entire state and that&#8217;s a real stretch.  Lots of money for something you can&#8217;t shoot anywhere anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yinn</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-2279</link>
		<dc:creator>yinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-2279</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=16&amp;GAID=9&amp;GA=95&amp;DocTypeID=SB&amp;LegID=27226&amp;SessionID=51&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Text of IL SB-16.&lt;/a&gt; You make some good points, tegegoi, especially about our troops vs. mercs but this bill is very specific to semiautomatic assault weapons of .50 caliber. That still leaves a whole lot of legal firearms out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=16&amp;GAID=9&amp;GA=95&amp;DocTypeID=SB&amp;LegID=27226&amp;SessionID=51" rel="nofollow">Text of IL SB-16.</a> You make some good points, tegegoi, especially about our troops vs. mercs but this bill is very specific to semiautomatic assault weapons of .50 caliber. That still leaves a whole lot of legal firearms out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tategoi</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>tategoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what I don&#039;t understand:  Emil Jones and his fellow Daley state reps are pushing to make Illinois totally anti-gun.  The passage of SB-16 will end up criminalizing thousands upon thousands of law abiding citizens who happen to enjoy shooting sports, shooting competitions and hunting.  We abide by the laws, yet we will become criminals if the bill passes.  Mr. Obama and Mr. Durkin also advocate anti-gun legislation and although I&#039;m a Democrat I don&#039;t think I can vote for either of them again.  

What really galls me is that they were blind to Illinois being invaded by Blackwater.  How must our troops, who earn on average 30 - 40K, feel when the guy next to them makes $127K?  That&#039;s the pay for a Blackwater mercenary.  And why should a kid who wants a career in the military stick around and work for his country when he can screw his country out of an additional 80K+ per year?  So far, this company that the elected officials of this state allowed into Illinois, has bilked the tax payers out of $750 million. And the Democratic Party of Illinois wants to make me a criminal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t understand:  Emil Jones and his fellow Daley state reps are pushing to make Illinois totally anti-gun.  The passage of SB-16 will end up criminalizing thousands upon thousands of law abiding citizens who happen to enjoy shooting sports, shooting competitions and hunting.  We abide by the laws, yet we will become criminals if the bill passes.  Mr. Obama and Mr. Durkin also advocate anti-gun legislation and although I&#8217;m a Democrat I don&#8217;t think I can vote for either of them again.  </p>
<p>What really galls me is that they were blind to Illinois being invaded by Blackwater.  How must our troops, who earn on average 30 &#8211; 40K, feel when the guy next to them makes $127K?  That&#8217;s the pay for a Blackwater mercenary.  And why should a kid who wants a career in the military stick around and work for his country when he can screw his country out of an additional 80K+ per year?  So far, this company that the elected officials of this state allowed into Illinois, has bilked the tax payers out of $750 million. And the Democratic Party of Illinois wants to make me a criminal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treesfieldssky</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>treesfieldssky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m also finishing his book entitled, &quot;Blackwater: The Rise of The World&#039;s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. He does a very good job of presenting Blackwater in the wider context of the neo-con and right wing religious agenda. A solid read worth delving into.

We are also working on having him speak in the area on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also finishing his book entitled, &#8220;Blackwater: The Rise of The World&#8217;s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. He does a very good job of presenting Blackwater in the wider context of the neo-con and right wing religious agenda. A solid read worth delving into.</p>
<p>We are also working on having him speak in the area on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yinn</title>
		<link>http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-2098</link>
		<dc:creator>yinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.citybarbs.com/?p=70#comment-2098</guid>
		<description>Another excellent piece by Scahill that traces the timeline of the Blackwater rise to prominence &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20070402&amp;s=scahill_vid&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is here.&lt;/a&gt; Hot off the press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another excellent piece by Scahill that traces the timeline of the Blackwater rise to prominence <a href="http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20070402&amp;s=scahill_vid" rel="nofollow">is here.</a> Hot off the press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
