Archive for October, 2010

District 428 Business Office

I phoned the business office of DeKalb C.U.S.D. at 8:30 a.m. with one question — who is the FOIA officer — and they never called back. It is now 6:06 p.m.

2010 Property Tax Assessments

These came out last week. They’ve come down a wee bit over 6% for every primary residence I’ve checked so far in DeKalb Township — everyone, that is, but our esteemed mayor and 2nd Ward alderman Tom Teresinski, who enjoyed downward adjustments of about 19% and 19.5%, respectively.

Way to share the pain, guys.

Meeting Comments & Questions

– Aldermen Gallagher, Baker and Kammes should be ashamed of themselves for voting against receiving and filing the Hope Haven emergency shelter expansion proposal. Instead of saying “no,” maybe they could talk about what it would take to overcome their misgivings. But, that would be too much work, I guess, and most of all too much like right.

– Did I miss a vote on the City of DeKalb’s appointment of a new financial advisor? Where did he come from, and why on earth is the Financial Advisory Committee being excluded from the debt restructuring discussion?

Friends of Kish College

The referendum PAC called Friends of Kishwaukee College does not actually have many friends, but no worries: they’ve selected well-heeled ones. In its pre-election report, 10 donors contributed $29,950. More contributions of $500+ have continued to roll in, including $10,000 from Demonica Kemper Architects of Chicago, for a grand total greater than $60,000 from about two dozen donors.

At least three donors are Kish College administrators. Frank Roberts of ReNew DeKalb fame is listed as an officer of this PAC.

Friends of Kish College, PAC #22822.

A Few Thoughts About Homelessness

I’ve talked about being homeless before. We were among the lucky ones, being able to return after the crash to our support system where there was always a safe place to sleep and a leg up where we really needed it.

Nevertheless, homelessness is a certifiable trauma however soft the landing, a tense and desperate time. I think about the children, blameless, yet finding themselves torn from their homes and neighborhoods.

————-

Jobs were the cure for our predicament, but that isn’t always the case. In ’93 we temporarily housed a homeless person as a way to pay forward our good fortune. This young man was pinned with a “P” as in p-r-e-y. Read the rest of this entry

Eric Zorn explains why calling for 10% across-the-board cuts in the state budget wouldn’t solve our money problems.

I happen to disagree with him about the value/ROI of a forensic audit of state spending, however. Here’s another discussion, including a recap of Adam Andrzjewski’s arguments in support of such an audit, here.

Rochelle to Get 250+ New Jobs

[Update 10/21: Groundbreaking ceremony & more info on Nippon Sharyo.]

I haven’t seen this anywhere else but the Rockford Register Star so far.

Gov. Pat Quinn comes to Rochelle at 11 a.m. today to announce that a $35 million to $40 million railcar factory, expected to employ 250 to 350 people, will be built in the city.

…Nippon Sharyo, which will build and operate the plant, is the railcar building partner of Sumitomo Corp. of America, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sumitomo Corp., a Japanese trading company.

According to a Sept. 22 news release on the Sumitomo website, a $560 million contract has been awarded to Nippon Sharyo to build 160 electric bi-level commuter cars for Metra, the commuter railroad that serves Chicago’s suburbs…

The Rochelle plant will consist of a car shell assembly shop, a final assembly shop, a test track and offices.

There must be some mistake! Rochelle doesn’t even have Home Rule! /snark

Seriously, though, what Rochelle does have is the infrastructure; i.e. the rail port. So the real mistake being made is giving a multi-national company that doesn’t need it $12 million in EDGE and other tax credits that the state doesn’t have. When do we stop playing the game?

Also, anybody remember why DeKalb turned down the rail port? The hindsight view doesn’t look very pretty right now.

I see some of comments left at the Daily Chronicle website express puzzlement that Mac McIntyre hasn’t yet filed suit in the case of the DeKalb Public Library Board’s violations of the Open Meetings Act. Today the Northern Star sheds some light:

Mac McIntyre, member of the Finance Advisory Committee, said the DeKalb Public Library board voted in closed session, on May 12, on the purchase of the neighboring DeKalb Clinic.

“In doing so, they broke the law. They also broke the law by not publishing that they were going into closed session or give any reason for going into closed session,” McIntyre said. “There was $1.8 million of public tax dollars that were approved and levied in closed session in three meetings of the Library Board…That $1.8 million is roughly equal to their annual operating budget.”

According to the Illinois Open Meetings Act, voting on appropriations of public funds in a closed forum is prohibited. McIntyre called for the postponement of the DeKalb Clinic purchase proposed on Oct. 25 until an investigation by the city council was made and it issued a public report of the findings.

My take: Mac is giving Council a chance to address the DKPL violations just as he allowed time for the State’s Attorney to act. How embarrassing it would be to file suit, only to discover afterward that Mayor Kris “Ethics Warrior” Povlsen was already fixin’ to clean up Dodge. Why, it would be almost as embarrassing as having a council that chose to do nothing at all.

HH 20 Year Anniversary

Clicking on the flyer will take you to an album devoted to HH expansion information.

DC Hits It Out of the Park

“Schaumburg: Open meetings agreement disappoints”.

The settlement – filed and approved in court this week and amounting to little more than a slap on the wrist – shows us that the DeKalb Library Board still has no credibility and that state laws in place to enforce and protect open and transparent government are viewed as a nuisance by many of those in power, including DeKalb County’s presiding judge.

It’s as incisive an editorial on this matter as I’d hoped to see, but didn’t really think I would. Bravo!